SAINT CHARLES, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: LEDR RECYCLING
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEDR RECYCLING in 60 MB CORPORATE PARK CT, SAINT CHARLES, MO 63301 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 342509098.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEDR RECYCLING
- Site address
- 60 MB CORPORATE PARK CT
- City
- SAINT CHARLES
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63301
- Mailing
- 60 MB CORPORATE PARK CT, SAINT CHARLES, MO 63301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): (1) All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition. On or about 08/24/2017, the employer did not ensure that the workplace was free of accumulation of combustible dust near the mulching area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $3622
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at least included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about 08/28/2017, the employer did not develop or implemented a written hazard communication program for the workers exposed to construction dust that contained silica.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2897
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about 08/28/1200, at the site where construction debris were recycled, the employer did not provide effective training about the chemicals present at the site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2897
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about 08/24/2017, in the sorting department, employees wearing N95 Respirators on voluntary basis, were not provided the information contained in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342509098.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.