OSHA Inspection: PADDY O'FLAHERTY'S

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.36(d)(2): Exit route doors were not free of a device or alarm that could restrict emergency use of the exit route if the device or alarm fails.  On or about July 25, 2017, an employee was exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards because the double exit doors from the kitchen leading to the exterior of the building near the dumpster were secured by a piece of lumber.

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit.":  On or about July 25, 2017, an employee was exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards because the single door from the kitchen leading to the dining area was not marked by a sign reading "Exit."

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:  On or about July 25, 207, an employee was exposed to contact with hot fry oil when operating the fryer and changing the fry oil and the employer did not provide the employee a suitable protective apron and protective arm sleeves.

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about July 25, 207, the employer did not evaluate, develop, and document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for the tasks performed by the cook assigned to use and clean the fryer and grill, nor did they complete a written certification that included the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment.  On or about July 25, 207, the employer did not provide suitable eye and face protection and employees were exposed to contact with hot fry oil when operating and cleaning the fryer.

Issued

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-10-06 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes.  On or about July 25, 207, the employer did not provide suitable hand protection and an employee was exposed to thermal burns to the hands when operating and cleaning the fryer with hot fry oil.