Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A+ ENGINEERING AND FABRICATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of A+ ENGINEERING AND FABRICATION, INC. in 17562 BEACH ST., GRAND RAPIDS, OH 43522 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 342526035.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A+ Engineering and Fabrication, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A+ Engineering and Fabrication, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
17562 BEACH ST.
City
GRAND RAPIDS
State
OH
ZIP
43522
Mailing
17562 BEACH ST., GRAND RAPIDS, OH 43522
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses eye protection that provides side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects. Detachable side protectors (e.g. clip-on or slide-on side shields) meeting the pertinent requirements of this section are acceptable.    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about August 3, 2017. Employees, working on the production floor with a hand held grinder, were exposed to flying material and the employer did not ensure that employees using detachable side protectors on their protective eye wear met the requirements of ANZI Z87.1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Jan 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program for employees required to use tight fitting respirators while working on the production floor painting fabricated parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Jan 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees, working on the production floor painting fabricated parts while wearing tight fitting half face respirators received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).  a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees, working on the production floor painting fabricated parts while wearing tight fitting half face respirators received fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary.  a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees, working on the production floor painting fabricated parts while wearing tight fitting half face respirators received training on the basic information on respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees utilizing a fork lift on the production floor received a combination of formal and practical training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about August 3, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees utilizing a fork lift on the production floor received an evaluation of their performance at least once ever three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24602590

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not develop and maintain a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees painting fabricated parts with paint containing hazardous materials: toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. Exposures to these chemicals can cause nervous system depression and chronic exposures can damage the liver, urinary system, cardiovascular system and reproductive system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 24602590

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) A+ Engineering and Fabrication, Inc. on or about July 27, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees painting fabricated parts with paint containing hazardous materials: toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. received hazard communication training. Exposures to these chemicals can cause nervous system depression and chronic exposures can damage the liver, urinary system, cardiovascular system and reproductive system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View A+ Engineering and Fabrication, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342526035.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.