Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: QUINCY PETROLEUM MANUFACTURING

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of QUINCY PETROLEUM MANUFACTURING in 1800 GARDNER EXPRESSWAY, QUINCY, IL 62305 (NAICS 333912). OSHA activity number 342530300.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quincy Petroleum Manufacturing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quincy Petroleum Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1800 GARDNER EXPRESSWAY
City
QUINCY
State
IL
ZIP
62305
Mailing
1800 GARDNER EXPRESSWAY, QUINCY, IL 62305
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333912
Employees
300
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2017
Abate by
Dec 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,885 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about July 29, 2017, employees were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards when performing maintenance and servicing on the Water Jetting Jet and the employer had not developed documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5885.1
  • · Z (S) $9054

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2017
Abate by
Nov 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: On or about July 29, 2017, employees were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards when performing maintenance and servicing on the Water Jetting Jet and the employer did not provided training to ensure the energy control program was understood, and the employees acquired the knowledge and skills required to isolate the energy sources on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2017
Abate by
Nov 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,885 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):      Employees who performed servicing and maintenance on the water jetting pumps were not required to:   (1)   Know the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy,    (2)   Turn off and shut down the machine,    (3)   Physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,   (4)   Affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device,   (5)   Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.       On or about July 29, 2017, employees were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards when performing maintenance and servicing on the Water Jetting Jet because the employer did not required to turned off or shut down the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5885.1
  • · Z (S) $9054

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342530300.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.