Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VISION WEB PRESS, INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VISION WEB PRESS, INCORPORATED in 5305 WEBB PARKWAY, LILBURN, GA 30047 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 342545175.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vision WEB Press, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vision WEB Press, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5305 WEBB PARKWAY
City
LILBURN
State
GA
ZIP
30047
Mailing
5305 WEBB PARKWAY, LILBURN, GA 30047
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts:    a) Plant - On or about 08/14/17 and at times prior thereto the employer operated the (older) Hantscho printing presses without guards. Workers were exposed to accidental contact with the rollers.    c) Plant - On or about 08/14/17 the employer operated the stapler/stitcher machine, and the interlock at the door of the stitcher head was not operating.     Or in the alternative:    29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):      a) Plant - On or about 08/14/17 and at times prior thereto the employer operated the (older) Hantscho printing presses without guards. Workers were exposed to accidental contact with the rollers.      c) Plant - On or about 08/14/17 the employer operated the stapler/stitcher machine, and the interlock at the door of the stitcher head was not operating.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3200
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.219 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):    a) Plant - On or about 08/14/17 and at times prior thereto the employer operated the Stitcher/Stapler machine, and the gear pair at the unused pocket was not guarded.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:      On or about 08/14/17 and at times prior thereto employees worked in proximity of the Hantscho printing presses and the dryer, and the employer did not assess the level of noise in order to determine whether a Hearing Conservation Program was required. (Instantaneous noise measurements: 90.7 dB, 90.4 dB, 97.3 dB, and 92.5 dB).    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Vision WEB Press, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342545175.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.