Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: MENARDS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MENARDS in 1280 MAPLE ST., FARMINGTON, MO 63640 (NAICS 452112). OSHA activity number 342550563.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Menards for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Menards is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MENARDS
Site address
1280 MAPLE ST.
City
FARMINGTON
State
MO
ZIP
63640
Mailing
5101 MENARD DR., EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
452112
Employees
143
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.7 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,811 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore to be recordable, if it results in any of the following: death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness:    a. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, an injury that occurred on 8-4-17 was not recorded on the 300 log.    b. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, an injury/illness that occurred on 5-14-17 was not recorded on the 300 log.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $900
  • · Z (O) $1811

1904.7 B03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:   a. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, the employer had not accurately entered the number of days away from work for an injury to an employee that occurred on 5-15-17.  The log stated there were 9 days away from work when the actual number was approximately 65.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $1811

1904.7 B04

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:   At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, the employer did not record the number of restricted days for the following employee injuries:  a. For an injury that occurred on 5-25-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 9.  b. For an injury that occurred on 5-15-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 19.  c. For an injury that occurred on 5-4-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 7.  d. For an injury that occurred on 4-26-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 23.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $1811

1904.29 B02

Other-than-serious 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,811 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness:    a. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 8-4-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    b. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-12-17, with boxes for Type of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank.    c. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-3-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    d. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-1-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    e. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 6-1-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    f. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-25-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank.    g. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-15-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Part of Body Affected, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    h. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-14-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank.    i. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-4-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred.    j. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 4-26-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $900
  • · Z (O) $1811

1904.40 A

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours:  On 8-14-17, OSHA requested the OSHA 301, or employer's similar injury report form, for three workplace injuries/illnesses that occurred on 5-15-17, 5-14-17, and 9-5-16.  The documents were not provided within four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $1811

View Menards's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342550563.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.