FARMINGTON, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: MENARDS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MENARDS in 1280 MAPLE ST., FARMINGTON, MO 63640 (NAICS 452112). OSHA activity number 342550563.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MENARDS
- Site address
- 1280 MAPLE ST.
- City
- FARMINGTON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63640
- Mailing
- 5101 MENARD DR., EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 452112
- Employees
- 143
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1904.7 A
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,811 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore to be recordable, if it results in any of the following: death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness: a. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, an injury that occurred on 8-4-17 was not recorded on the 300 log. b. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, an injury/illness that occurred on 5-14-17 was not recorded on the 300 log. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $900
- · Z (O) $1811
1904.7 B03
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: a. At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, the employer had not accurately entered the number of days away from work for an injury to an employee that occurred on 5-15-17. The log stated there were 9 days away from work when the actual number was approximately 65. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1811
1904.7 B04
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: At the time of the inspection on 8-14-17, the employer did not record the number of restricted days for the following employee injuries: a. For an injury that occurred on 5-25-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 9. b. For an injury that occurred on 5-15-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 19. c. For an injury that occurred on 5-4-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 7. d. For an injury that occurred on 4-26-17, 0 days were entered on the log, but the number of restricted days was approximately 23. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1811
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,811 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness: a. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 8-4-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. b. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-12-17, with boxes for Type of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank. c. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-3-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. d. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 7-1-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. e. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 6-1-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. f. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-25-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank. g. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-15-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Part of Body Affected, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. h. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-14-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank. i. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 5-4-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness and Initial Treatment left blank, and an incomplete response for How Injury Or Illness/Abnormal Health Condition Occurred. j. The Missouri Workers' Compensation Report of Injury (OSHA Form 301 equivalent) was not correctly filled out for an injury that occurred on 4-26-17, with boxes for Type Of Injury Illness, Physician Health Care Provider, and Initial Treatment left blank. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $900
- · Z (O) $1811
1904.40 A
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,811 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours: On 8-14-17, OSHA requested the OSHA 301, or employer's similar injury report form, for three workplace injuries/illnesses that occurred on 5-15-17, 5-14-17, and 9-5-16. The documents were not provided within four hours.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1811
More inspections at Menards
View Menards's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 452112)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342550563.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.