Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARCELINO GUALLPA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARCELINO GUALLPA in 15 LEETE ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01108 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342551140.

Watch Marcelino Guallpa — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marcelino Guallpa is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARCELINO GUALLPA
Site address
15 LEETE ST
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01108
Mailing
66 HAZEL STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    15 Leete St, Springfield , MA  On August 15 and August 16, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than twenty feet while they were performing residential roofing work.  Employees left the ladder and climbed to the peak before they attached the lanyard to their fall protection harness.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.502 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(1): Personal fall arrest system connectors were not drop forged, pressed or formed steel, or made of equivalent materials:  15 Leete St, Springfield, MA  On August 15, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards due to improper connectors of their personal fall arrest systems.  Some employee lanyards were connected by a tied knot to the anchor points and some lanyards were connected to the harness straps instead of the D-ring.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(ii): The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used:  15 Leete St, Springfield, MA  On August 16, 2017 and at times prior, the employer did not provide proper training to employees on the personal fall arrest systems they were using.  Employees did not know that some of their personal fall arrest system practices were prohibited.   Specifically, they allowed their harnesses to be loose and twisted, their lanyards to be connected to anchors using knots, their anchors to not be fully attached to roof by hardware, and their anchor fasteners to be those other than specified by manufacturer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  15 Leete St, Springfield, MA  On August 16, 2017 and at times prior, the employer had no written certification that employees who were found to be exposed to fall hazards had received the required fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  15 Leete St, Springfield, MA  On August 15, 2017 and at times prior, the employer allowed employees to use a ladder to access a 20 foot high roof that had a horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder that was approximately one-half of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.   15 Leete St, Springfield, MA  On August 15, 2017 and at times prior, the employer allowed employees to use a ladder to access a 20 foot high roof that had a bent rung.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342551140.