NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: A AND L REMEDIATION SERVICES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of A AND L REMEDIATION SERVICES, LLC in 209 N 1ST STREET, NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32168 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 342556941.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A AND L REMEDIATION SERVICES, LLC
- Site address
- 209 N 1ST STREET
- City
- NEW SMYRNA BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32168
- Mailing
- 2455 TOMOKA FARMS ROAD, PORT ORANGE, FL 32128
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562910
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) On or about April 19, 2017, two (2) employees removing Asbestos roof tiles on a 6:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 10 feet to the ground by the use of a guardrail system, safety nest system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.1101 E05
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(5): The employer did not ensure that employees did not eat, drink, smoke, chew tobacco or gum, or apply cosmetics in the regulated area: a) On or about April 19, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees conducting class II asbestos work did not smoke in the regulated area during removal. b) On or about April 19, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees conducting class II asbestos work did not drink in the regulated area during removal.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1101 F01 II
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(ii): Determinations of employee exposure were not made from breathing zone air samples that were representative of the 8-hour time weighted average and 30-minute short-term exposures for each employee: a) On or about April 19, 2017, the employer failed to determined the 8-hour time weighted average and 30-minute short-term exposures to airborne Asbestos of two (2) employees removing Asbestos roof tiles by accurately performing air monitoring of the airborne concentrations of the employees' breathing zone.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 G08 II B
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(B): Feasible wet methods were not used to remove roofing materials that were not intact or that were rendered not intact during removal: a) On or about April 19, 2017, the employer failed to use wet method to reduce the exposure of employees conducting class II asbestos work to airborne fibers where the pieces of tile broke during removal.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 I01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1): The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. a) On or about April 19, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that full body covering protective clothing was used by the employees when appropriate 8-hour time weighted average and 30-minute short-term exposures to airborne Asbestos of two (2) employees removing Asbestos roof tiles had not been accurately performed by conducting air monitoring of the airborne concentrations of the employees' breathing zone.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562910)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342556941.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.