Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: ADMIRAL CLIMATE CONTROL, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADMIRAL CLIMATE CONTROL, LLC in 50 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE, STRATHAM, NH 03885 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 342559655.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Admiral Climate Control, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Admiral Climate Control, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
50 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE
City
STRATHAM
State
NH
ZIP
03885
Mailing
PO BOX 608, ROCHESTER, NH 03867
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Site- Employees working underneath and near suspended crane loads were not protected from struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1358
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    Site- An employee working from the roof was exposed to a fall of approximately 15 feet while standing a the roof edge receiving a crane load where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1902
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1412 D01 XIV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(d)(1)(xiv): Safety devices and operational aids were not inspected each shift for proper operation:    Site- Employees were not protected from struck by hazards where the Venturo HT40KX truck crane was operated with a defective boom angle indicator that was not identified in a shift inspection and repaired before placing into service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1358
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.1412 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1412(e)(1): The equipment in service was not inspected each month in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section (each shift):  Site- Employees were not protected from struck by hazards where the employer did not conduct and document the required monthly inspection of the Venturo HT40KX truck crane at the site .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1413 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1413(b)(1): Each month a wire rope inspection was not conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) (shift inspection) of this section:  Site- Employees were not protected from struck by hazards where the employer did not conduct and document the required monthly inspection of the wire rope on the Venturo HT40KX truck crane at the site .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1412 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(1): The equipment was not inspected at least every 12 months by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.     Site- Employees were not protected from struck by hazards where the employer did not conduct and document the required annual inspection of the Venturo HT40KX truck crane at the site .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.1413 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1413(c)(1): At least every 12 months, wire ropes in use on equipment were not inspected by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section (shift inspection) and documented according to (c)(4) of this section.    Site- Employees were not protected from struck by hazards where the employer did not conduct and document the required annual inspection of the wire rope on the Venturo HT40KX truck crane at the site .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342559655.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.