SEARSPORT, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: PARKERS ROOFING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PARKERS ROOFING, INC. in 52 MAIN ST, SEARSPORT, ME 04974 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342561578.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARKERS ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 52 MAIN ST
- City
- SEARSPORT
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04974
- Mailing
- 139 LINCOLNVILLE RD, BELMONT, ME 04952
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Fowler-True-Ross House - Employees working on an 8/12 pitch roof more than 20 feet above the ground were not protected from falling.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $3803
- · I (S) $1901
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Fowler-True-Ross House - The aluminum extension ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2716
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: Fowler-True-Ross House - An employee climbing the aluminum extension ladder was carrying a 12 foot long wooden plank which could cause him to lose balance and fall.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342561578.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.