OSHA Inspection: SAI BABA INC.

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): Lamps used in temporary wiring for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage:    a.  On or about August 9, 2017, 1st floor hall, two lamp bulbs for temporary lighting were not protected from accidental contact or breakage and exposes employees to electrical hazards

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(F): Temporary lights were suspended by their electric cords when such lights and cords were not designed for suspension:    a.  On or about August 9, 2017, 1st floor hall, temporary lighting lamp bulbs hung by their electric cords which exposes employees to electrical hazards.

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    a.  On or about August 9, 2017, and times prior, at the south exterior side of the hotel, from a 2nd floor window opening an employee stepped onto a wooden box that was supported by the forks of a rough terrain forklift truck.   The wooden box was not constructed in accordance with ANSI/ITSDF 56.6 and exposes the employee to fall hazards and struck-by hazards.

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:    a.  On or about August 9, 2017 and at times prior, at the south exterior side of the hotel, a rough terrain forklift truck supported a wooden box and an employee entered the wooden box from a 2nd floor window opening.  The wooden box was not approved for use by the forklift truck manufacturer and exposes the employee to fall hazards and struck-by hazards.

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks.    a.  On or about August 9, 2017, and at times prior, at the south exterior side of the hotel, forklift truck operations did not meet the requirements of ASME B56.1-1969 in that the forklift truck was not attended by the forklift operator when the forks were elevated, and the horn, backup alarm, and a tail light did not function and exposes employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Dec 22, 2017

Abate by

Jan 18, 2018

Penalty

Initial $724 · Current $434 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): An injury or illness involving one or more days away from work, was not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days column.  If the employee is out for an extended period of time, you must enter an estimate of the days that the employee will be away, and update the day count when the actual number of days is known:    a.  On or about August 9, 2017, establishment, a work-related injury involving days away from work was not recorded on the OSHA Form 300 or an equivalent form.