Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: GRANITE/RLW JOINT VENTURE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GRANITE/RLW JOINT VENTURE in GRAND AVE AND 7TH ST, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 342564598.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Granite/Rlw Joint Venture for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Granite/Rlw Joint Venture is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
GRAND AVE AND 7TH ST
City
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
81601
Mailing
50629 HIGHWAY 6, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Abate by
Nov 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   (a) Granite/RLW Joint Venture at 7th St. and Grand Ave., Denver, CO: On and before August 18, 2017, the employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace associated with employees conducting point and patch and jackhammering work on concrete containing crystalline silica. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory health hazards associated with respirable silica.  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.103.  Abatement Note: This evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Abate by
Nov 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Granite/RLW Joint Venture at 7th St. and Grand Ave., Denver, CO: On and before August 18, 2017, the employer required employees to use N95 filtering facepieces during point and patch and jackhammering work on concrete containing crystalline silica but did not conduct medical evaluations. This condition potentially exposed employees to health hazards introduced with the use of respirators.  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.103.  Abatement Note; When tight-fitting filtering facepieces usage is required by the employer, you must ensure that the workers are medically able to wear the respirators. Using a respirator may place a physiological burden on employees that varies with the type of respirator worn, the job and workplace conditions in which the respirator is used, and the medical status of the employee. "Appendix C to Sec. 1910.134: OSHA Respirator Medical Evaluation Questionnaire" contains the mandatory information that employees must complete so that a physician (health care professional) may decide if it is appropriate for the employees to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Abate by
Nov 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Granite/RLW Joint Venture at 7th St. and Grand Ave., Denver, CO: On and before August 18, 2017, the employer required employees to use N95 filtering facepieces during point and patch and jackhammering work on concrete containing crystalline silica but did not conduct fit testing prior to initial use of the respirator. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory health hazards associated with respirable silica.  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.103.  Abatement Note: The employer shall establish a record of the qualitative (QLFTs) and quantitative (QNFTs) fit tests administered to an employee including: The name or identification of the employee tested; Type of fit test performed; Specific make, model, style, and size of respirator tested; Date of test; and The pass/fail results for QLFTs or the fit factor and strip chart recording or other recording of the test results for QNFTs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Abate by
Nov 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   (a) Granite/RLW Joint Venture at 7th St. and Grand Ave., Denver, CO: On and before August 18, 2017, the employer required employees to use N95 filtering facepieces during point and patch and jackhammering work on concrete containing crystalline silica but did not ensure that  employees did not have facial hair that came between the sealed surface of the facepiece. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory health hazards associated with respirable silica.   Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.103.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Abate by
Nov 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  (a) Granite/RLW Joint Venture at 7th St. and Grand Ave., Denver, CO: On and before August 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work areas. Employees used gasoline, diesel, form oil, and epoxies in the course of work activities. The employer provided employee access to Safety Data Sheets (SDS's) through a phone app on Supervisor cells phones. The employer did not provide an alternative means to access SDS's.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a chemical hazard.  Note: The requirements applicable to the construction standard under this section are identical to other set forth in 29 CFR 1926.59.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342564598.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.