OVERLAND PARK, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: DIEGO PAREDES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DIEGO PAREDES in CORNER OF 159TH & QUIVARA LOT 311, OVERLAND PARK, KS 66062 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342570181.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DIEGO PAREDES
- Site address
- CORNER OF 159TH & QUIVARA LOT 311
- City
- OVERLAND PARK
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66062
- Mailing
- 2708 N. 18TH ST., KANSAS CITY, KS 66104
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer has not certified to OSHA the following items cited inspection #1257018 1-1) 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Abatement was due 10/05/2017 1-2a) 29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Abatement was due 09/14/2017 1-2b) 29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): Abatement was due 09/14/2017 1-2c) 29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Abatement was due 09/14/2017
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer has not certified to OSHA the following items cited in inspection #1257018 1-3) 29CFR 1926.501(b)(13); Abatement was due 09/14/2017 1-4) 29CFR 1926.1053(b)(1); Abatement was due 09/21/2017
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.) While performing framing operations the employer did not initiate an adequate safety program that would ensure a safe and healthful working environment. In this case the employee/s were exposed to a fall hazard in excess of twelve (12) feet and a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1629.6
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: In the interior of the building being constructed a 4x6 inch blue plastic electrical box with triple duplex receptacles installed was attached to the end of the black two foot flexible cord. This box was being used to energize portable power tools and was not listed, labeled or certified for use as a part of an extension cord/distribution box. Employees were exposed to the hazard of contacting an energized electrical circuit resulting in a shock.a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $978
- · Z (S) $1630
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers. In energized installations each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. In the interior of the building being constructed a 4x6 inch blue plastic electrical box with triple duplex receptacles installed did not have a cover installed that adequately/completely covered the open areas of the box. Employees were exposed to the hazard of contacting an energized electrical circuit resulting in a shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: In the interior of the building being constructed a 4x6 inch blue plastic electrical box with triple duplex receptacles installed was attached to the end of the black two foot flexible cord. The black cord did not have the outer insulation of the cord attached to the box in a manner to ensure that any strain would not be transmitted to the screws within the box. Employees were exposed to the hazard of contacting an energized electrical circuit resulting in a shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems: On the south side of the building being constructed the employer did not ensure that fall protection was utilized while framing and/or roof sheeting operations. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard in excess of twelve (12) feet from the eave to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2281.8
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: The employer did not ensure that the ladder being utilized to access the roof where roof sheeting was being installed was extended at least three feet above the landing surface of the roof. It was extended approximately 18 inches. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately one (1) foot from the eave to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1629.6
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Diego Paredes
View Diego Paredes's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342570181.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.