Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R. R. LEDUC CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of R. R. LEDUC CORPORATION in 100 BOBALA RD., HOLYOKE, MA 01040 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 342570678.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R. R. Leduc Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R. R. Leduc Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 BOBALA RD.
City
HOLYOKE
State
MA
ZIP
01040
Mailing
100 BOBALA RD., HOLYOKE, MA 01040
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
52
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,437 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA    On August 22, 2017 and at times prior, the Timesavers 2200 machine had had no energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4436.5
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.    100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA    On August 22, 2017 and at times prior, the employer's energy control procedures were not accurate for some machines, including and not limited to the Amada with ASR machine.  Also, many energy control procedures erroneously included stop, start, and emergency stop switches as lockout locations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:    100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA    On August 22, 2017 and at times prior, the employer's machine specific energy control procedures did not include procedures that employees were to follow to test that all energy sources were successfully isolated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Nov 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,437 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA    On August 22, 2017, the employer had only performed a 2015 accuracy review of each energy control procedure.  The employer's procedure for annual inspection did not meet three requirements of this standard: 1) did not inspect each procedure for inaccuracies during an actual energy control maintenance or servicing task, 2) did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under each energy control procedure, and 3) did not require the inspection to be performed by an authorized employee other than the ones utilizing the energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4436.5
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Nov 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:   100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA  On August 22, 2017 at the opening of the inspection, the employer had not trained all new employees on the energy control program to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program were understood.  The employer had not provided any energy control training since November 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Nov 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,169 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA       On August 22, 2017 at the opening of the inspection, the employer had not evaluated the performance of any powered industrial truck operators for over four years.  The employer only provided formal classroom training and a written test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3169
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Nov 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    100 Bobala Rd, Holyoke, MA       On August 22, 2017 at the opening of the inspection, the employer had not provided Hazard Communication training for new employees since November 2013.  Some new employees worked in production areas where adhesives and degreasers were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5070

View R. R. Leduc Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342570678.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.