OSHA Inspection: ARTURO TOMAS-ENCARNCION

Issued

Jul 18, 2018

Abate by

Aug 13, 2018

Penalty

Initial $311 · Current $311

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 1,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.   b) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.   c.) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 3,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.

Issued

Jul 18, 2018

Abate by

Aug 13, 2018

Penalty

Initial $311 · Current $311

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, Item1,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.   b) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, Item 2,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.   c.) On or about July 18, 2018, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, Item 3,  issued on February 13, 2018 with an abatement due date of March 12, 2018.

Issued

Feb 13, 2018

Abate by

Mar 12, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about August 22, 2017, at 927 Blind Brook Circle, Hoschton, Georgia:  Two employees performing roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards from nails and wood chips while operating Hitachi NV45AV2 nail guns without wearing eye protection.

Issued

Feb 13, 2018

Abate by

Mar 12, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:  On or about August 22, 2017, at 927 Blind Brook Circle, Hoschton, Georgia:  Two employees performing roofing work were exposed to amputation hazards while using an air compressor without the guard attached that covered the rotating belts and pulleys.

Issued

Feb 13, 2018

Abate by

Mar 12, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about August 22, 2017, at 927 Blind Brook Circle, Hoschton, Georgia:  Two employees performing roofing work were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 21.1-feet when they worked on an approximately 10/12 slope roof without using fall protection.