Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO HERRARA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO HERRARA in 2688 WITTENBERG DRIVE, LANCASTER, OH 43130 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342574688.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pedro Herrara for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Herrara is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PEDRO HERRARA
Site address
2688 WITTENBERG DRIVE
City
LANCASTER
State
OH
ZIP
43130
Mailing
4715 SULLIVANT AVENUE LOT 101, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about August 23, 2017, employees were performing roofing work from the roof of a residential house without fall protection, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately fourteen foot.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342574688.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.