Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ELITE CUSTOM CONCRETE, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELITE CUSTOM CONCRETE, LLC in 1930 PORTAGE TRAIL, CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44221 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 342578226.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elite Custom Concrete, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elite Custom Concrete, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1930 PORTAGE TRAIL
City
CUYAHOGA FALLS
State
OH
ZIP
44221
Mailing
3003 9TH STREET SW, CANTON, OH 44710
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components shall be inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.   On or about August 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that a competent person inspected a mobile scaffold prior to it being put into use at a job site.  An employee was observed using this scaffold to perform the task of cutting out portions of an exterior building wall in order to install a large widow at a store located at the end of a small strip mall.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    On or about August 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that an access ladder was used to get on to and off of a mobile scaffold.  An employee was using the scaffolds cross braces and other structural components to climb up and down from the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.452 W01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(1): The mobile scaffold was not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, to prevent racking or collapse of the scaffold and secure vertical members together laterally so as to automatically square and align the vertical members.  On or about August 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that a mobile scaffold was properly braced.  An employee who was climbing on and working from the scaffold had unconnected a cross brace so that he could get closer to the building wall that he was cutting with a circular hand saw (Husqvarna, X-TORQ orange).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used:  On or about August 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that an employee using a mobile scaffold was properly trained in the hazards associated with the use of the scaffold.  An employee was using the mobile scaffold to perform the task of cutting out portions of an exterior building wall in order to install a large widow at a store located at the end of a small strip mall.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On or about August 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that an employee who was working from a height of approximately 16 feet on a mobile scaffold was protected from a fall hazard.  The employee was not wearing a personal fall arrest system and harness.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342578226.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.