PRINCETON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: TEOFILO ANTONIO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TEOFILO ANTONIO in 1403 GRANITE PATH, PRINCETON, TX 75407 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342586849.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEOFILO ANTONIO
- Site address
- 1403 GRANITE PATH
- City
- PRINCETON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75407
- Mailing
- 1601 SYLVAN DRIVE, PLANO, TX 75074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: (a) Employees were observed installing cornicing while standing on scaffold platforms that were only approximately ten (10) inches wide exposing them to a fall hazard of approximately twelve (12) feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: (a) Employees cornicing the eaves of a house were not protected from a fall hazard when they were using scaffolding without railings installed or personal fall arrest system in use at a height of approximately twelve (12) feet above the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Employees installing cornicing were working while standing on top of roof rafters and were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately ten (10) feet or more to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342586849.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.