HARTLAND, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: LIPSTICK PAINTING LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LIPSTICK PAINTING LLC in 249 MILLINGTON LANE, HARTLAND, WI 53029 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342595881.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LIPSTICK PAINTING LLC
- Site address
- 249 MILLINGTON LANE
- City
- HARTLAND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53029
- Mailing
- 230 SUMMERHAVEN LANE, LAKE GENEVA, WI 53147
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) The employer failed to provide certification to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that was issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) Employees painting an apartment building were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed (a) The portable ladder being used for access to the balcony did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing area.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2173
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342595881.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.