Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CACTUS VARIED INDUSTRIES LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CACTUS VARIED INDUSTRIES LLC in 2005 B AVENUE, AMARILLO, TX 79111 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 342600210.

Watch Cactus Varied Industries LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cactus Varied Industries LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2005 B AVENUE
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79111
Mailing
2209 W. 7TH, AMARILLO, TX 79106
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
61
Ownership type
A

20 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $2756.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:    Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from compressed gas cylinders that were not stored properly:    a). Oxygen cylinders on the north wall were not chained/secured to prevent displacement
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2756
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $5431.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:    Employees were exposed to fire/explosion hazards when working in spray booths not equipped with automatic sprinklers or other approved systems.    a). East end spray booth
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5431
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.107 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame or spark producing equipment was located in the spraying area or within 20 feet thereof, and was not separated by a partition.  In the west spray area employees engaged in using the spray booth were exposed to flame and explosion hazards because a cigarette lighter was stored in the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $5104.00
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms.    Employees engaged in using the spray booths were exposed to flame and explosion hazards because "No smoking" signs were not posted at all spraying areas:    a). East end spray booth
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5104
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $4593.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to work in the spray booths and exposed them to adverse health effects from exposure to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4593
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to use a respirator while working in the spray booths; exposing employees to hazardous atmospheric conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    The employer did not provide fit tests for employees required to use a respirator while working in the spray booths; exposing employees to hazardous atmospheric conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $8315.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy:    The employer did not have written energy control procedures for the press brakes exposing employees to amputation and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8315
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $6431.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    The motor housing on the metal roller was not guarded exposing employees to caught by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6431
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.243 C04

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(4): The top half of the wheel of portable grinding machine(s) was not enclosed:  Employees operating the blue Makita portable grinder at the southeast corner of the builder were exposed to caught-in and struck-by hazards because the top half of the grinder was not enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.254 D09 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7391.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced:  Employees at the east end of the shop operating the Millermatic 252 MIG welder west of the spray booth were exposed to electrical hazards because the cables were not replaced when the insulation was damaged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7391

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $8315.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):    Employees working around the 120/208 electrical panel boxes were exposed to electrical hazards because wiring were not protected against accidental contact with live parts:    a). North wall underneath the divide    b). Pillar on the east side of the shop where the welders work
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8315
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $2756.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Unless specifically permitted otherwise in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section, flexible cords and cables may not be used to run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors.    Employees engaged in work in and around the west end spray area were exposed to electrical hazards because an electrical cord was being run through a hole cut in the side of the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2756
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.107 B09

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  The west end spray booth contained a waste container that was not placed to provide three feet of clearance for cleaning purposes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 C05

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): The employer failed to ensure that locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residue and explosive vapors, there was not electrical equipment in any spraying area, whereon deposits of combustible residues may readily accumulate, except wiring in rigid conduit or in boxes or fittings containing no taps, splices, or terminal connections.    Combustible residue was allowed to accumulate on extension cords and portable lights used in the west end spray area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 G03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(3): Residue scrapings and debris contaminated with residue were not immediately removed from the premises and properly disposed. Approved metal waste cans were not provided wherever rags or waste were impregnated with finishing material; and all such rags or waste were not deposited therein immediately after use. The contents of waste cans were not properly disposed of at least once daily or at the end of each shift.  In the west spray area employees working in spray booth were exposed to flame and explosion hazards because residue scrapings and debris were not removed from the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C04

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not kept in their designated places at all times except during use:  Employees working near the east end spray booth are exposed to fire hazards because fire extinguishers are not being kept in their designated place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $1299.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were not maintained in a legible condition:    Employees working with the Komatsu FG25 forklift were exposed to hazards because the nameplate was not maintained in a legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1299
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:  In the spray west end spray area employees engaged in operating the gantry cranes are exposed to struck-by hazards because hooks are not being certified a serial number or other identifier of the hook inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1037.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  Employees working in the west end spray booth were exposed to chemical hazards because old paint was being stored in a container that was not labeled, tagged, or marked with the contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1037

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342600210.