Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARMANDO MARQUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMANDO MARQUEZ in 205 WEST EIGHTH STREET, SEA ISLAND, GA 31561 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342606910.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armando Marquez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armando Marquez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARMANDO MARQUEZ
Site address
205 WEST EIGHTH STREET
City
SEA ISLAND
State
GA
ZIP
31561
Mailing
224 BUCK ISLAND ROAD, BLUFFTON, SC 29910
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a) Roof, Front Elevation - On or about September 1, 2017, an employee performing painting work while on the roof of a new two-story residence was exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 13 feet onto earthen ground in that the worker was not fall protected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,309 · Current $1,385 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:    a) Rear Porch - On or about September 1, 2017 and times prior to, a concrete stairway system consisting of 6 risers  was not equipped with a handrail or stair rail system on either of its opens sides, thus exposing employees of fall hazards of up to about 4 feet onto earthen ground.    b) Front Porch - On or about September 1, 2017 and times prior to, a wooden stairway system consisting of 6 risers (including the porch landing) was not equipped with a stair rail system on either of its open sides, thus exposing employees of fall hazards of up to about 4 feet onto earthen ground.    c) Garage - On or about September 1, 2017 and times prior to, a wooden stairway system consisting of 5 risers was not equipped with a stair rail system on either of its open sides, thus exposing employees of fall hazards of up to about 3 feet onto earthen ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1385.4
  • — Z (S) $2309

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) Roof, Front Elevation - On or about September 1, 2017, an employee used an aluminum extension ladder to gain access to the roof of the building without the side rails of the ladder being extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, thus exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 13 feet onto earthen ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

View Armando Marquez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342606910.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.