Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELIO SANDOVAL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELIO SANDOVAL in 389 LEE WAY, LEWIS CENTER, OH 43035 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342615861.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elio Sandoval — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elio Sandoval is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELIO SANDOVAL
Site address
389 LEE WAY
City
LEWIS CENTER
State
OH
ZIP
43035
Mailing
5461 KIRKLAND WAY, COLUMBUS, OH 43231
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level.   a. On or about September 6, 2017, employees were installing hardieplank siding from a ladder jack scaffold without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately fourteen foot.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about September 6, 2017, employees were installing hardieplank siding from the porch roof without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately eleven foot.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Elio Sandoval's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342615861.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.