TROY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: MIMIR FLEXO PRINTING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MIMIR FLEXO PRINTING in 300-A INDUSTRIAL DR., TROY, MO 63379 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 342616174.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIMIR FLEXO PRINTING
- Site address
- 300-A INDUSTRIAL DR.
- City
- TROY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63379
- Mailing
- 300-A INDUSTRIAL DR., TROY, MO 63379
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: At the time of the inspection, the employer had not developed written machine specific procedures for locking out multiple energy source equipment such as printing presses and re-rollers. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $2463
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $2,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: At the time of the inspection, each Mark/Andy flexographic printing press had multiple ingoing nip points that were not guarded to prevent employee exposure to amputation hazards. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2463
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342616174.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.