OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL ACEVEDO

Issued

Jun 4, 2018

Abate by

Jul 9, 2018

Penalty

Initial $415 · Current $415

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for:   (a) Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 12/12/2017 with an abatement due date of 12/22/2017.  (b) Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 12/12/2017 with an abatement due date of 12/21/2017.

Issued

Jun 4, 2018

Abate by

Jul 9, 2018

Penalty

Initial $415 · Current $415

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for:  (a) Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 12/12/2017 with an abatement due date of 12/22/2017.  (b) Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 12/12/2017 with an abatement due date of 12/21/2017.

Issued

Dec 12, 2017

Abate by

Dec 22, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,897 · Current $1,449 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about September 6, 2017 at 1221 E. Main Street, Canton, Georgia, where employees were replacing a roof on the residence, the employees on the ground picking up the debris were not wearing hard hats.  The employees were exposed to the struck by hazard from the flying debris.

Issued

Dec 11, 2017

Abate by

Dec 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about September 6, 2017 at 1221 E. Main Street, Canton, Georgia, employees removing the old roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 6 feet to the lower level.  None of the employees were wearing or using the fall protection they had.