Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JACK COOMES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JACK COOMES in 212 E MCKAY, FRONTENAC, KS 66763 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 342618840.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jack Coomes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jack Coomes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JACK COOMES
Site address
212 E MCKAY
City
FRONTENAC
State
KS
ZIP
66763
Mailing
1129 S 220, PITTSBURG, KS 66762
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold being used by an employee performing steel erection operations (roofing installation) was fully planked - one wide plank of approximately 18 inches was installed. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately nineteen (19) feet from the platform to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.6
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold being used by an employee performing steel erection operations (roofing installation) was provided with fall protection. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately nineteen (19) feet from the platform to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which secure vertical members together laterally, and automatically square and align the vertical members so that the erected scaffold is always plumb, level, and square.  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold being used by an employee performing steel erection operations (roofing installation) that adequate braces were installed to ensure the scaffold remained plumb and ridged. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately nineteen (19) feet from the platform to the concrete below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,309 · Current $1,385 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.  The employer did not ensure that employees performing steel erection operations (roofing installation) were provided fall protection. Employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately twenty one (21) feet from the roof area to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1385.4
  • — Z (S) $2309

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342618840.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.