CUMMING, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: MARCOS QUIAHUA PANZO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCOS QUIAHUA PANZO in 4110 SPRING RIDGE DR, CUMMING, GA 30028 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342634995.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCOS QUIAHUA PANZO
- Site address
- 4110 SPRING RIDGE DR
- City
- CUMMING
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30028
- Mailing
- 5554 BALLARD WAY, NORCROSS, GA 30071
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: On or about at 9/13/17 located at 4110 Spring Ridge Dr., Cumming, GA: Employees were observed installing roofing shingles on the roof of an house that was under construction while using a pneumatic nail gun without safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.5
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about at 9/13/17 located at 4110 Spring Ridge Dr., Cumming, GA: Employees were installing roofing shingles on the roof of a house that was under construction while working at the edge, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used by his employees while exposed to fall hazards of approximately up to 22 feet above the lower level while on the 7/12 pitch roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.5
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.502 D20
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(20): The employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves: On or about at 9/13/17 located at 4110 Spring Ridge Dr, Cumming, GA: Employees were installing roofing shingles on the roof of a house that was under construction while working at the edge, the employer did not ensure a rescue plain was in place for fall protection for his employees approximately up to 22 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1629.5
- · Z (S) $3259
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342634995.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.