Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERNANDEZ SOFFIT & SIDING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HERNANDEZ SOFFIT & SIDING, LLC in 55 ASTRA WAY, SAINT JOHNS, FL 32259 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342636503.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hernandez Soffit & Siding, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hernandez Soffit & Siding, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
55 ASTRA WAY
City
SAINT JOHNS
State
FL
ZIP
32259
Mailing
5931 COUNTY RD 218, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32234
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section:      a.    On or about September 7, 2017, on the 4:12 pitch roof at the front gable, employees installing soffit were exposed to a 12 feet fall hazard from the eave to the concrete walk in that they were not protected by a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2173.2
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:  a.   On or about September 7, 2017, the fly section of an extension ladder was used as a base ladder section on the roof at the front gable, exposing employees to a 12 feet fall hazard.  b.   On or about September 7, 2017, the fly section of an extension ladder was used as a base ladder section for roof access at the eave above the front door, exposing employees to a 12 feet fall hazard.  C.   On or about September 7, 2017, the fly section of an extension ladder was used as a base ladder section in front of the garage, exposing employees to a 12 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2173.2
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):      a.    On or about September 7, 2017, in front of the double garage, the fly section of an extension ladder was set at a 55 degree angle, exposing employees to a fall hazard of up to 9 feet.       b.    On or about September 7, 2017, in front of the single garage, an extension ladder was set at a 63 degree angle, exposing employees to a fall hazard of up to 8 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:      a.    On or about September 7, 2017, on the 4:12 pitch roof above the front entrance, the fly section of an extension ladder was placed on the sloped roof surface and was not secured from slipping, exposing an employee to a 15 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342636503.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.