Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONCEPTS BY DESIGN, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONCEPTS BY DESIGN, LLC in 364 PUTNAM PIKE, DAYVILLE, CT 06241 (NAICS 337212). OSHA activity number 342638293.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Concepts by Design, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Concepts by Design, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
364 PUTNAM PIKE
City
DAYVILLE
State
CT
ZIP
06241
Mailing
364 PUTNAM PIKE, DAYVILLE, CT 06241
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337212
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Facility-wide:  Where portable fire extinguishers were mounted and available for use, the employer had not developed and implemented an emergency action plan directing employees to either evacuate the building or use portable fire extinguishers in case of emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, near Panel Saws:  Two portable fire extinguishers were observed available for use which had not been subject to annual inspection since 1998.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  The employer had not developed or implemented a respiratory protection program which included fit tests, employee medical evaluation and storage requirements for employees required to wear respiratory protection while spraying paints and lacquers.   Employees wore 3M half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirators with organic vapor cartridges while engaged in painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  The tight-fitting half face elastomeric respirators were used with organic vapor cartridges, but were not provided a pre-filter to address the hazards of airborne particulate including paint droplets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  Employees who were required to wear 3M half-face elastomeric tight-fitting respirators with organic vapor cartridges during spraying operations had not been provided medical evaluations to determine if they were medically fit to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  Employees who were required to wear 3M half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirators with organic vapor cartridges during spraying operations had not been fit tested prior to being allowed to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  A 3M half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirator with organic vapor cartridges was stored hanging by the straps from a nail.  The respirator was not cleaned after each use and stored in a non-porous, sturdy, airtight container.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Spray Area:  Employees required to wear 3M half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirators with organic vapor cartridges for spraying operations had hot been provided training in the respiratory hazards to which they were potentially exposed; and in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, limitations on their use, and their maintenance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Shop:  The Hyster battery powered forklift, Serial Number C10 Y21244L, used 60-inch fork extensions.  There were no markings on the vehicle to identify the fork extensions as attachments and to show the modified lifting capacity of the vehicle with the extensions in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Apr 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Facility-Wide:  Employees allowed to operate the company's Hyster battery-powered forklift with 60-inch forks had not been provided training and evaluation on the specific vehicle they would be driving.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Production Shop:  A Delta Unisaw used for ripping was not provided with an automatically adjusting hood to cover the blade during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Production Area near Station 1:  A 32-inch diameter metal-encased pedestal fan was not properly grounded, exposing employees to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Production Area near Station 1 and time clock:  A 32-inch diameter metal-encased pedestal fan had the insulation pulled from the flexible cordset and the wires had been damaged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Facility-Wide:  The employer had not developed a hazard communication program which discussed chemical container labeling and other forms of warning, updated safety data sheets, and employee training.  Employees used flammable chemicals including Valspar YYT1009 lacquer thinner, Valtec PC 55 WW Lac 680 LH-20 Paint, and Formica 155R contact adhesive.  Exposure to these chemicals can cause skin irritation, serious eye damage, allergic skin reaction, cancer, suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child, drowsiness or dizziness, damage to organs and may be fatal if swallowed and enters the airways.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1848
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:   A.  On or about September 18, 2017, Production Areas:  Employees wearing Uline S-9632 N95 filtering facepiece respirators on a voluntary basis to protect themselves from airborne particulate had not been provided the basic information on respirators included in Appendix D to OSHA's respiratory protection standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342638293.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.