BILOXI, MS —
OSHA Inspection: BEACH CLUB APTS.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BEACH CLUB APTS. in 139 MC DONNELL ST., BILOXI, MS 39531 (NAICS 531110). OSHA activity number 342642014.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEACH CLUB APTS.
- Site address
- 139 MC DONNELL ST.
- City
- BILOXI
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39531
- Mailing
- 304 HIGHWAY 90, SUITE B, WAVELAND, MS 39576
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- No inspection (D)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531110
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A03
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into pysical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. (a) Outside edge of roof around building - On or about September 15, 2017 employees repairing roof of 2 story apartment building were working around the energized 3 phase 120volt main building electrical supply lines that were not marked or protected to prevent accidental contact by employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.453 B02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket: (a) South side of building - On or about September 15, 2017 employee working from elevated aerial basket was standing on the mid rail with one leg and the other leg on the roofs edge repairing damaged roof material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) South side of building - On or about September 15, 2017 employee operating Genie aerial lift 17 feet high with no fall protection to prevent employee from being ejected out of basket.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. (a) Along the entire roof perimeter - On or about September 15, 2017 employees working from 2 story apartment building repairing damaged roof with no type of fall protection to prevent them from falling off the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) South East side of building - On or about September 15, 2017 employees repairing roof gained access to the roof using an aluminum extension ladder that did go 3 feet past the edge of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531110)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342642014.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.