OSHA Inspection: ROMIRO MIRELES

Issued

Dec 13, 2017

Abate by

Dec 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $305 · Current $305

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a)  The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 1a, Citation 1 Item 1b and Citation 1 Item 3.

Issued

Oct 2, 2017

Abate by

Oct 31, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,988 · Current $2,988

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  On or about September 19, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs.

Issued

Oct 2, 2017

Abate by

Oct 31, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about September 19, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.

Issued

Oct 2, 2017

Abate by

Oct 31, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about September 19, 2017, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.

Issued

Oct 2, 2017

Abate by

Oct 11, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,390 · Current $2,390

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about September 19, 2017, employees performing site clean-up underneath additional employees performing tear-off duties on a residential home were doing so without head protection.

Issued

Oct 2, 2017

Abate by

Oct 11, 2017

Penalty

Initial $8,366 · Current $8,366

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:  On or about September 19, 2017, employees performing tear-off duties on a residential home at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.  Romiro Mireles, dba Mireles Remodeling, was previously cited for a violation of this or its equivalent Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1105456, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1, Issued on 11/16/2015, and was affirmed final order on 12/28/2015, with respect to a workplace located at N179 Oakwood Ave, Greenville, WI 54942.