Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADPM PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADPM PROJECT MANAGEMENT LLC in 2201 PENROSE AVE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342648441.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adpm Project Management LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adpm Project Management LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2201 PENROSE AVE
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19145
Mailing
108 RT 70, MEDFORD, NJ 08055
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  (a) 2201 Pennrose Ave- On or about 9/20/17, employees were not provided training on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to silica, in their work areas.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,434 · Current $4,434
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) 2201 Penrose Ave - On or about 9/20/17, employees working in an excavation were not protected from head injury while positioning under-hung loads, exposing employees to head injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4434

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) 2201 Penrose Ave - On or about 9/20/17, employees were allowed to cut concrete using a demolition saw without the use of eye protection, exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2956

1926.102 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wears prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design, or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.  (a) 2201 Penrose Ave - On or about 9/20/17, employees were allowed to cut concrete using a demolition saw while using non-safety prescription lenses and without the use of eye protection that can be worn over prescription lenses, exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:  (a) 2201 Pennrose - On or about 9/20/17, employees performing work in an excavation approximately 6 feet deep were not provided with stairways, ladders, ramps or other safe means of egress from the excavation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2956

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary.  (a) 2201 Pennrose - On or about 9/20/17, employees performing work in an excavation approximately 6 feet deep with spoils placed less than 2 feet from the edge of the excavation, exposing employees to engulfment hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift:  (a) 2201 Pennrose - On or about 9/20/17, a competent person did not inspect the excavation, exposing employees to cave-in hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c).  (a) 2201 Pennrose - On or about 9/20/17, employees performing work in an excavation approximately 6 feet deep were not provided with cave-in protection, exposing employees to engulfment hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3696

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $739 · Current $739
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  (a) 2201 Pennrose Ave - On or about 9/20/17, the employer failed to provide copies of OSHA 300 and 300a for 2014, 2015, 2016, and year-to-date 2017 when requested by a Compliance Safety and Health Officer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $739

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342648441.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.