DE FOREST, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JASSO CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JASSO CONSTRUCTION INC. in 7184 HOLIDAY COURT, DE FOREST, WI 53532 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342658119.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JASSO CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 7184 HOLIDAY COURT
- City
- DE FOREST
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53532
- Mailing
- 814 E OLD WILLOW ROAD, APT. 216, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, IL 60070
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about September 25, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about September 25, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about September 25, 2017, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: On or about September 25, 2017, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA ladder standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about September 25, 2017, employees working from a steep-sloped hotel roof performing tear-off at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2662.1
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about September 25, 2017, to access the working level, employees were utilizing a portable metal extension ladder that was not extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: On or about September 25, 2017, employees utilizing metal portable extension ladders were carrying sheets of plywood.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Jasso Construction INC.
View Jasso Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342658119.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.