LEWISTON, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: START TO FINISH LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of START TO FINISH LLC in 680 LISBON STREET, LEWISTON, ME 04240 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 342660123.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- START TO FINISH LLC
- Site address
- 680 LISBON STREET
- City
- LEWISTON
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04240
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2051, LEWISTON, ME 04241
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: At the Facility - The employer had not developed a written respiratory protection program for those employees required to wear a respirator during spray cleaning operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2535.4
- · Z (S) $3622
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: At the Facility - The employer did not determine if those employees required to wear a half face cartridge respirator were medically able to do so.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make)was used, and at least annually thereafter: At the Facility - Employees required to wear a half face cartridge respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use nor annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: At the Facility - The employer did not prevent the use of tight fitting respirators by employees whose facial hair came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and their face.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training initially and annually to employees who are required to use respirators: At the Facility - The employer did not provide effective training to employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: At the Facility - The employer had not developed and/or maintained a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2535.4
- · Z (S) $3622
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: At the Facility - The employer did not ensure that the secondary containers containing the hood and vent cleaner (soap), were labeled.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342660123.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.