LITCHFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: 7 NORTH STREET LITCHFIELD, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 7 NORTH STREET LITCHFIELD, LLC in 7 NORTH ST., LITCHFIELD, CT 06759 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342660628.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 7 NORTH STREET LITCHFIELD, LLC
- Site address
- 7 NORTH ST.
- City
- LITCHFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06759
- Mailing
- PO BOX 1416, WASHINGTON, CT 06793
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns to install asphalt roofing shingles were provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the 4-inch square electrical junction box that contained two 120 volt duplex outlets was provided with a faceplate that would cover the exposed energized electrical terminals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1629.5
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working on the commercial buildings roof were protected from fall hazards above six feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets, personal fall arrest systems or a monitoring system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.5
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work on the roof at a height above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 A02 II F
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(F): Temporary lights were suspended by their electric cords when such lights and cords were not designed for suspension. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the temporary lights installed throughout the building under construction were suspended by their socket base.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342660628.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.