OSHA Inspection: JAGUAR CARPENTRY INC

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Nov 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to identify hazards and take prompt corrective actions.

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Nov 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Site- Employees working from the first floor and the ground were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not worn at the site.

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Nov 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not ensure that eye protection was worn.

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Nov 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Site- Employees working from the second floor were not protected from a fall of approximately 13 feet to the exterior grade and 9 feet to the first floor where the employer did not require the use of fall protection.

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Nov 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  Site- Employees using the stairway to access the second floor were not protected from a fall of up to approximately 9 feet where a stair rail system was not installed along the unprotected edge of the stairway.

Issued

Nov 15, 2017

Abate by

Dec 5, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards while working from the second floor were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.