Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PROMARK CONTRACTING LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of PROMARK CONTRACTING LLC in 100 FRY DRIVE, MECHANICSBURG, PA 17050 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342668019.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Promark Contracting LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Promark Contracting LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 FRY DRIVE
City
MECHANICSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
17050
Mailing
30896 LORAIN ROAD, NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Nov 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation.    (a) 100 Fry Drive, Mechanicsburg Pennsylvania - An employee mixed a two part liquid chemical that had one part that was corrosive.  The employer did not ensure that the employee used appropriate eye protection, on or about September 27, 2017.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.75
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Dec 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a) 100 Fry Drive, Mechanicsburg Pennsylvania - An employee mixed a two part liquid chemical that had one part that was corrosive.  The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program which describes labeling and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee training, on or about September 27, 2017.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Dec 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a) 100 Fry Drive, Mechanicsburg Pennsylvania   - An employee mixed a two part liquid chemical, with one part that was corrosive.  The employer did not ensure that the employee was provided with training on the steps the employee needed to take to protect themselves from chemical exposure, on or about September 27, 2017.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342668019.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.