TENAFLY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MUHABAERK BUDHRAM
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MUHABAERK BUDHRAM in 11 LINDLEY AVE, TENAFLY, NJ 07670 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 342668878.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MUHABAERK BUDHRAM
- Site address
- 11 LINDLEY AVE
- City
- TENAFLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07670
- Mailing
- 214 CLOSTER DOCK RD, CLOSTER, NJ 07624
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561790
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C11
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(11): The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to an upper landing surface had side rails that extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface. a) Roof: Employee utilized an extension ladder for roof access that extended approximately 14" above the roof level and was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while engaged in gutter/roof cleaning activities, on or about 9/9/17.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) Roof: Employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet while engaged in gutter/roof cleaning activities without a personal fall arrest system or other means of acceptable fall protection in place, on or about 9/9/17.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561790)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342668878.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.