EFFINGHAM, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: SCOTT NISBET
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCOTT NISBET in 309 WEST POPLAR DRIVE, EFFINGHAM, IL 62401 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342679313.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCOTT NISBET
- Site address
- 309 WEST POPLAR DRIVE
- City
- EFFINGHAM
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62401
- Mailing
- 14160 E. 850TH AVE., EFFINGHAM, IL 62401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,301 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while workers were using hand tools to remove asphalt shingles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1301
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $1,955 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately nine (9) feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof shingles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1955
- · Z (S) $3259
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: The employer did not provide fall protection training to enable employees to recognize and control the fall hazards at their worksite while performing residential construction. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately nine (9) foot.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2173
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342679313.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.