Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PROMISED LAND DAIRY, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PROMISED LAND DAIRY, LLC in 2008 HWY 97 WEST, FLORESVILLE, TX 78114 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 342683752.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Promised Land Dairy, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Promised Land Dairy, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2008 HWY 97 WEST
City
FLORESVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78114
Mailing
2008 HWY 97 WEST, FLORESVILLE, TX 78114
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311511
Employees
38
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2017
Abate by
Nov 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $1,956 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) On or about October 5, 2017, in the weighing station room, the employer did not guard the two ingoing nip points on the conveyor line. The employees will take milk off the conveyor line to weigh it. The employees are exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating plastic belts.    b) On or about October 5, 2017, in the filling station room, the employer did not guard the ingoing nip point on the conveyor line. The employees will walk near the line and inspect the empty milk bottles. The employees are exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating plastic belt.   c) On or about October 5, 2017, in the packaging room, the employer did not guard the ingoing nip point on the conveyor line. The employees work in this  area and walk the line to inspect the boxes. The employees are exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating plastic belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1955.6
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2017
Abate by
Dec 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $1,956 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):       a) On or about October 5, 2017,  in the packaging room, the box erector was not guarded. The employees place boxes on box erector chute. The box erector grabs the boxes and opens them up. The employees are exposed to the activation of the suction cups/arms of the box erector. The employees are exposed to a struck- by hazard.    b) On or about October 5, 2017, in the filler room, there are two areas on this machine that rotate when filling the milk bottles.  Employees exposed to struck-by hazard from the rotating milk dispensers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1955.6
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2017
Abate by
Oct 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $1,956 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    On or about October 5, 2017, in the bottling room,  here were two rotating protruding shafts on the conveyor line. The shafts projected out more than one half the diameter of the shaft.  The employees will walk the conveyor line to inspect it. Employees exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating shaft. The rotating shafts protruded out approximately three quarters of an inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1955.6
  • — Z (S) $4889

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,889 · Current $1,956 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:  On or about October 4, 2017, in the packaging room, the chain and sprocket were not guarded on the out-going side of box erector machine. Employees work and walk along the line to ensure the boxes move on the conveyor. The employees exposed to a caught-in hazard from the rotating chain and sprocket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1955.6
  • — Z (S) $4889

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342683752.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.