Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALEXANDER'S PLUMBING AND PUMPS INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALEXANDER'S PLUMBING AND PUMPS INC in 4236 FAIRFIELD ROAD, FAIRFIELD, PA 17320 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 342695459.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alexander'S Plumbing and Pumps INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alexander'S Plumbing and Pumps INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4236 FAIRFIELD ROAD
City
FAIRFIELD
State
PA
ZIP
17320
Mailing
4236 FAIRFIELD ROAD, FAIRFIELD, PA 17320
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a)  VARIOUS JOB SITES - Employees used 3M N95 filtering face piece respirators while performing their jobs, and the employer did not provide training or instruction on how to use, maintain and store the respirators, thereby exposing employee(s) to possible injuries, on or about October 11, 2017.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a)  VARIOUS WORK SITES - The employer did not determine the employee(s) abilities to safely use 3M N95 respirators in the workplace prior to requiring the employee(s) to use them while working in dusty environments, which thereby exposed the employee(s) to possible respiratory injuries, on or about October 11, 2017.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174

Hazardous substances C730

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of carbon monoxide listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 50 parts per million:  (a) Church  - An employee was exposed to carbon monoxide at a calculated value of 296 parts per million (ppm) which was 5.9 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of 50 ppm, on or about July 28, 2017.  No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5174

1904.7 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $739 · Current $739
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore be recordable:  (a)  FACILITY WIDE - The employer did not record on the OSHA 300 injury and illness log workplace injuries that were classified as recordable injuries when an employee sustained an over exposure to carbon monoxide, on or about July 28, 2017.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $739

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a)  SHOP AND VARIOUS JOB SITES - The employer did not certify in writing that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed, on or about October 11, 2017.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342695459.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.