Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL SALES, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL SALES, INC. in 36 NORTH ROAD, DETROIT, ME 04929 (NAICS 325311). OSHA activity number 342697026.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Northeast Agricultural Sales, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Northeast Agricultural Sales, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
36 NORTH ROAD
City
DETROIT
State
ME
ZIP
04929
Mailing
P.O. BOX 190, DETROIT, ME 04929
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325311
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $6,971 Reduced

Hazardous substances S101

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm, in that employees were exposed to explosion, deflagration or other fire hazards from combustible dust:    Employees were exposed to combustible fertilizer dust hazards in the following instances:    a) Main Material Elevator, Main Building - The riser trunk was not dust tight and allowed combustible dust to escape, settle and accumulate on equipment and other surfaces.    b) Main Material Elevator, Main Building - The system containing combustible dust was not provided with adequate explosion venting.    c) Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The distance between the out-flow chute and the openings in the floor, that feeds the individual hoppers, did not prevent the accumulation of combustible dust.    d) Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - On about October 11, 2017, nonsparking scoops or shovels were not utilized to clean areas containing combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6971
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $6,971 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces were not kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition:    Main Material Elevator, Main Building - On or about 10/16/2017, the machinery, framework and electrical equipment were not kept clean and the surfaces were coated with combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6971
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The floor of each workroom was not maintained in a clean condition:    The floor was not maintained in a clean condition, in the following instances:  a) Main Material Elevator, Main Building - The floor was coated with combustible dust.  b) Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The floor was  coated with combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.28 B01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,114 · Current $4,979 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by a standard guardrail system.    Ladder Platform, Delivery Hopper - The platform 8.5 feet above the ground was not equipped with a midrail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979
  • — Z (S) $7114

1910.28 B03 I

Serious Gravity 1 9 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $2,987 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(3)(i): Holes. The employer did not ensure each employee was protected from falling through any hole (including skylights) that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower lever:    Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The eight exposed openings for the individual hoppers were not guarded against employees stepping into them while performing cleaning operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2987
  • — Z (S) $4268

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $3,983 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - On or about October 11, 2017, employees wearing respirators were not protected by a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3983
  • — Z (S) $5691

1910.134 D03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not provide a respirator that was appropriate for the chemical state and physical form of the contaminant:  Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The employer supplied an employee exposed to airborne fertilizer dust with inappropriate respiratory protection in that ammonia cartridges but no particulate filters were provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The employer did not fit test employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable respirator training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The employer did not provide training to employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B08 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Mar 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $6,971 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(8)(i): Electric equipment was not firmly secured to the surface on which it was mounted:    Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The electrical conduit, boxes, and light fixture were not securely mounted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6971
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.303 B01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(ii): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards, based on the mechanical strength and durability, including, for parts designed to enclose and protect other equipment, the adequacy of the protection thus provided:  Upper Doghouse, Delivery Hopper - The light fixture was not equipped with a globe or bulb protective enclosure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,114 · Current $4,979 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment.    Southwest Side, Maintenance Workshop - The right side breaker panel was missing a breaker or blank in slot 14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979
  • — Z (S) $7114

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 32 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,114 · Current $4,979 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    Circuit breakers were not marked as to their purpose, in the following instances:    a) Right Panel, Southeast Side of the Maintenance Workshop - Breaker 3 was not labeled.    b) Left Panel, Southeast Side of the Maintenance Workshop - Breakers 7/9 and 17 were not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979
  • — Z (S) $7114

1910.303 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,114 · Current $4,979 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening where they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910:    Working space in front of electrical breaker panels was less than three feet, in the following instances:    a) Southeast Side of Maintenance Workshop - Access to the two breaker panels was blocked by the red toolbox/work bench.    b) Northwest Side of Maintenance Workshop - Access to the single breaker panel was blocked by fuel cans, cardboard box and other debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4979
  • — Z (S) $7114

View Northeast Agricultural Sales, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342697026.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.