JANESVILLE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: R L HANDYMAN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of R L HANDYMAN in 25 W. MILWAUKEE ST., JANESVILLE, WI 53546 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342699196.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R L HANDYMAN
- Site address
- 25 W. MILWAUKEE ST.
- City
- JANESVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53546
- Mailing
- 2134 S. RIVER RD., JANESVILLE, WI 53546
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using head protection when conducting work in proximity to loads suspended by a crane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work from the roof of a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2662
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342699196.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.