BRONX, NY —
OSHA Inspection: GMJ CONTRACTING CORP.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of GMJ CONTRACTING CORP. in 960 PROSPECT AVENUE, BRONX, NY 10459 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342701240.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GMJ CONTRACTING CORP.
- Site address
- 960 PROSPECT AVENUE
- City
- BRONX
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10459
- Mailing
- 6 CEDAR RD, NANUET, NY 10954
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): The employer did not provide voluntary respirator users information contained in Appendix D of this section: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY: On or about 11/1/17, an employee operating the cement mixer wore respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not provide them with information contained in Appendix D of this section; on or about 11/1/17.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2000
- — C (S) $3880
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY: On or about 11/1/17, an employee operating the cement mixer wore respiratory protection (e.g., N95 respirator) and the employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to guard against a health hazard to the user; on or about 11/1/17.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.50 G
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(g): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY - East Wing - 2nd Floor: An employee mixing and pouring concrete (caustic) along with other employees who were pumping concrete (caustic) into block and the employer did not provide suitable facilities (e.g., emergency eyewash or equivalent) for quick flushing of the eyes in the work area for immediate emergency use; on or about 11/1/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $1000
- — C (S) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.52 D01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY: An employee cutting concrete blocks using a masonry saw was exposed to noise levels in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 90 dBA on 11/7/17. The employee was exposed to a continuous noise level of 96.0 dBA as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA), which was equivalent to 230.3% of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The sampling time was for 438 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. The employer did not administer a continuing and effective hearing conservation program which included noise monitoring and audiometric testing; on or about 11/7/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3000
- — C (S) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.451 E09 IV
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress: a) East Building - 2nd Floor: Employees throughout the area were climbing cross bracing to access and egress tubular welded frame scaffold; on or about 11/1/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3000
- — C (S) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, East Building - Adjacent 2nd Floor:- Side Facing Rev James A Polite Avenue: Fall protection was not used by employees standing on and erecting the second level of tubular welded scaffolding; on or about 11/1/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $6467
- — Z (S) $6467
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY - East Wing, 2nd Floor - Side Facing Rev James A Polite Avenue: An employee placing leveling line at the unprotected edge of the floor which was approximately 20 feet above the level below was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems; on or about 11/1/17. b) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY - East Wing - 2nd Floor: Employees working along and walking back and forth along a walkway with an unprotected edge which was approximately 10 feet above the level below were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems; on or about 11/7/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $9054
- — Z (S) $9054
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: a) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY- East Wing - 2nd Floor: Employees examining and performing masonry work were exposed to impalement hazards due to steel rebar which was not guarded; on or about 11/1/17. b) 960 Prospect Avenue, Bronx, NY - East Wing - 2nd Floor: An employee assisting in delivery of materials to the 2nd floor was exposed to an impalement hazard due to steel rebar which was not guarded; on or about 11/7/17.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $6467
- — Z (S) $6467
More inspections at GMJ Contracting Corp.
View GMJ Contracting Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342701240.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.