Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EKC, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EKC, INC. in 1010 MAIN ST, BOISE, ID 83702 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342712593.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EKC, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EKC, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EKC, INC.
Site address
1010 MAIN ST
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83702
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1465, BOISE, ID 83701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,563 · Current $2,063 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):  Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.   a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:   Employees were engaged in roof demolition activity on a low-slope roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The north side was marked with a warning line 6 feet from the edge.    The employer had utilized a safety monitoring system on the roof.  However, temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  b) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working adjacent to the east parapet while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the east side of the building was up to 24 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards were over 25 feet to an adjacent building.   There was not a warning line system on the east side of the building.   Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  c) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working within 6 feet of the south roof edge while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the south side of the building was approximately 9 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards were over 40 feet to ground level.  There was not a warning line system on the south side of the building.  Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  d) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working within 4 feet of the west roof parapet while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the west side of the building was approximately 18 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards into an interior skylight pit were over 25 feet.  There was not a warning line system on the west side of the building.  Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  NOTE:  Abatement certification is not required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2063
  • — Z (S) $4563

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:   Employees were engaged in roof demolition activity on a low-slope roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The north side was marked with a warning line 6 feet from the edge.    The employer had utilized a safety monitoring system on the roof.  However, temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.   b) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working adjacent to the east parapet while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the east side of the building was up to 24 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards were over 25 feet to an adjacent building.   There was not a warning line system on the east side of the building.   Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  c) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working within 6 feet of the south roof edge while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the south side of the building was approximately 9 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards were over 40 feet to ground level.  There was not a warning line system on the south side of the building.  Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.  d) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto: Employees were working within 4 feet of the west roof parapet while engaged in roof demolition activity on a roof having dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet.   The parapet on the west side of the building was approximately 18 inches high.  Employees were not wearing fall protection.   Potential fall hazards into an interior skylight pit were over 25 feet.  There was not a warning line system on the west side of the building.  Temporary employees were not trained in the safety monitoring system in use in the workplace.   NOTE:  Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,956 · Current $1,956
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail.    a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:   The first floor stairway was missing a handrail.    b) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:   The stairway to the roof was missing a handrail.      NOTE: Abatement certification is not required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1956
  • — Z (S) $1956

1926.21 B04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(4): In job site areas where harmful plants or animals are present, employees who may be exposed were not instructed regarding the potential hazards, and how to avoid injury, and the first aid procedures to be used in the event of injury.  a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:  Employees were not instructed in how to avoid health hazards from bird droppings on the work site.  NOTE:  Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.51 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coating, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees.   a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:  Employees were not provided with washing facilities to protect from and avoid health hazards from bird droppings on the work site.  NOTE:  Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.51 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.51(h):  Every enclosed workplace was not constructed, equipped, and maintained, so far as reasonably practicable, as to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, and other vermin.   a) On or about October 18, 2017 or prior thereto:  The work site was not constructed to prevent the entrance of birds through the roof stairway access point.  NOTE:  Abatement certification is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View EKC, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342712593.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.