BATON ROUGE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: HEBERT MASONRY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HEBERT MASONRY in 2106 ELWOOD CT, BATON ROUGE, LA 70809 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342716545.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HEBERT MASONRY
- Site address
- 2106 ELWOOD CT
- City
- BATON ROUGE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70809
- Mailing
- 22330 RABID RUN DR., BATON ROUGE, LA 70817
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a.) On or about October 19, 2017, on the north side of the house; the employer allowed employees to toss bricks while working from scaffolding without wearing any type of head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a.) On or about October 19, 2017 on the north side of 2106 Elwood Court, Baton Rouge, La. 70819; the employer did not ensure that each supported scaffold working level was fully planked between the platform and the uprights. The workers were working from heights above ground level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.2
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $652 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a.) On or about October 19, 2017 on the north side of 2106 Elwood Court, Baton Rouge, La. 70819; the employer allowed employees to use scaffolding that did not have adequate base plates or mud sills. Employees were working at heights above four feet from ground/next level below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $652
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a.) On or about October 19, 2017 on the north side of 2106 Elwood Court, Baton Rouge, La. 70819; the employer allowed employees to use scaffolding that did not have a safe means of access or egress.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.2
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,086 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a.) On or about October 19, 2017 on the north side of 2106 Elwood Ct Baton Rouge, La. 70819; The employer allowed employees to work from the second story roof of a residential home without fall protection or fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1086.4
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Hebert Masonry
View Hebert Masonry's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342716545.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.