Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL ROBERTO GUAMAN CASIAGUANO / GGCI / GUARDIAN GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC / GUARDIAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DANIEL ROBERTO GUAMAN CASIAGUANO / GGCI / GUARDIAN GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC / GUARDIAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC in 5 WATER STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 342718483.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daniel Roberto Guaman Casiaguano / Ggci / Guardian General Contractors INC / Guardian General Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel Roberto Guaman Casiaguano / Ggci / Guardian General Contractors INC / Guardian General Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5 WATER STREET
City
DANVERS
State
MA
ZIP
01923
Mailing
17 SUMMIT STREET APT 2, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard:  Location - 5 Water Street, Danvers, MA.  On or about October 21, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls by allowing the employees to gain access to a upper level using the shingle platform hoist as a ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects.   Location - 5 Waters Street, Danvers, MA. On or about October 21, 2017, employees were not wearing hard hats to protect them from overhead hazards while working below roofers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   Location - 5 Waters Street, Danvers, MA. On or about October 21, 2017, eye and face protection was not available for employees who were using pneumatic nail guns and hammers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.  Location - 5 Waters Street, Danvers, MA. On or about Oct 21, 2017, an employee was not protected from falling while working on a roof that reached a height of twenty three feet above lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee.  Location - 5 Water Street, Danvers, MA. On or about Oct 21, 2017, employees were not protected from falling when using a personal fall protection system which did not have an anchor point of supporting at least 5000 pounds. Anchors were not secured per manufacturers instructions. Multiple employees were also attached to two of the four anchors.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service.  Location - 5 Water Street, Danvers, MA. On or about Oct 21, 2017, lanyards were not inspected prior to use. Damaged lanyards were not removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jun 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Location - 5 Water Street, Danvers, MA. On or about Oct 21, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees exposed to fall hazards were properly trained.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  Location - 5 Water Street, Danvers, MA. On or about Oct 21, 2017, employees were not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

View Daniel Roberto Guaman Casiaguano / Ggci / Guardian General Contractors INC / Guardian General Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342718483.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.