STAMFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: VVM BUILDERS LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VVM BUILDERS LLC in 2119 LONG RIDGE ROAD, STAMFORD, CT 06903 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342718780.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VVM BUILDERS LLC
- Site address
- 2119 LONG RIDGE ROAD
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06903
- Mailing
- 22 GLENBROOK ROAD APT. 315, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: JOBSITE: The vertical support poles of the pump jack scaffold were not set on mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1740
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. JOBSITE: The pump jack scaffold that the employees were working from was not braced or secured at the bottom of the scaffold poles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. JOBSITE: The pump jack scaffold that the employees were working from at 12 feet 11 inches above the ground was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1740
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. JOBSITE: The employees installing siding were exposed to the hazard of falling 12 ft. 11 inches to the ground while working on the platform of a pump jack scaffold without the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2470
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: JOBSITE: The employees who worked from pump jack scaffold without fall protection at a height of 12 ft. 11 inches above the ground were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: JOBSITE: The employees performing work on a pump jack scaffold were not provided with training by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with erecting, operating, maintaining, and inspection of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342718780.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.