FORT WASHINGTON, PA —
OSHA Inspection: IMPLANT DENTISTRY ASSOCIATES OF PHILADELPHIA, PC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of IMPLANT DENTISTRY ASSOCIATES OF PHILADELPHIA, PC in 501 W. OFFICE CENTER DRIVE #210, FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 342721610.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IMPLANT DENTISTRY ASSOCIATES OF PHILADELPHIA, PC
- Site address
- 501 W. OFFICE CENTER DRIVE #210
- City
- FORT WASHINGTON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19034
- Mailing
- 501 W. OFFICE CENTER DRIVE #210, FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,078 · Current $1,847 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure: a) Lab: Employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens while altering patient prosthetics and the administration of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccination series was not arranged within the 10 days of the initial assignment, on or about October 20, 2017. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1846.8
- — Z (S) $3078
1910.1030 G02 II A
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,078 · Current $1,847 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure might take place: a) Lab: Employees exposed to bloodborne pathogens while altering patient prosthetics were not provided training as required by the standard at the time of initial assignment, on or about October 20, 2017. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1846.8
- — Z (S) $3078
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually: a) Facility wide: Employees exposed to bloodborne pathogens while assisting in patient care and while altering patient prosthetics were not provided training within one year of their previous training, on or about October 20, 2017. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2017
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,847 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): a) Facility wide: Employees use Activated Maxicide and IvoBase polymer and an updated safety data sheet was not maintained for these chemicals, on or about October 20, 2017. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1847
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $924
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) Facility wide: Employees use Activated Maxicide, ProBase Monomer Cold liquid and powder, Great Lakes Polymer and monomer, and IvoBase polymer and employees were not provided information about how to obtain the safety data sheets, on or about October 20, 2017. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $923.5
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342721610.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.