Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREEN EXPECTATIONS LANDSCAPING COMPANY, INC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GREEN EXPECTATIONS LANDSCAPING COMPANY, INC in 26575 W 100TH, OLATHE, KS 66061 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 342727252.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Green Expectations Landscaping Company, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Green Expectations Landscaping Company, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
26575 W 100TH
City
OLATHE
State
KS
ZIP
66061
Mailing
1910 S 74TH ST, KANSAS CITY, KS 66106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
37
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,803 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, travel restraint system or personal fall arrest system:  Employees engaged in shop activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8 feet from the walking-working surface to the concrete below when accessing storage without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3802.8
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:  Employees engaged in landscaping equipment maintenance activities were exposed to amputation hazards in that the abrasive wheel on the grinding machinery was missing the guard to cover the spindle end, nut, and flange projection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  Employees engaged in landscaping equipment maintenance were exposed to amputation hazards in that the work rest was approximately one-quarter inch to five-eighths inch from the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  Employees engaged in landscaping equipment maintenance were exposed to stuck-by and amputation hazards in that the adjustable tongue guard on the bench grinder (Ryobi no ID) was missing, leaving the opening greater than one-half inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3): The contact surface(s) of wheel(s), blotter(s) or flange(s) on grinding machine(s) were not flat and free or foreign matter:  Employees engaged in landscaping equipment maintenance were exposed to amputation hazards in that the contact surfaces of the abrasive wheels were not flat.  a) Ryobi 6 inch Thin Line bench grinder  b) Oregon P/N 88-023, QQ grinding machine
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  Employees engaged in landscaping activities were exposed to amputation hazards in that the belts and pulleys of the tillers and sod cutters were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o).  a) Honda Tiller GCAAK-1343758  b) Honda Tiller Model FRC800 Company Marked #2  c) Bluebird Sod Cutter Model 968999351 S/N 073837578  d) Bluebird Sod Cutter Model 968999351 S/N 093396021  e) Husqvarna SC18 Sod Cutter Model 968999509 S/N 131000277
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  Employees engaged in landscaping activities were exposed to amputation hazards in that the belts and pulleys of the tillers and sod cutters were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o).  a) Honda Tiller GCAAK-1343758  b) Honda Tiller Model FRC800 Company Marked #2  c) Bluebird Sod Cutter Model 968999351 S/N 073837578  d) Bluebird Sod Cutter Model 968999351 S/N 093396021  e) Husqvarna SC18 Sod Cutter Model 968999509 S/N 131000277
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:     Employees engaged in landscaping equipment maintenance activities were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards in that the relocatable power taps were permanently secured to the shop walls, used in place of fixed wiring and connected to extension cords.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2281.2
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Employees engaged in landscaping were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer did not develop a written hazardous communication program for employees that use chemicals such as but not limited to; 28-0-0 Fertilizer, Krylon Spray Paints, LESCOSol Spray Tank Cleaner, and Sonolastic NP1 Polyurethane Sealant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:    Employees engaged in landscaping were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer did not have safety data sheets in the workplace for employees that use chemicals such as but not limited to; 28-0-0 Fertilizer, Krylon Spray Paints, LESCOSol Spray Tank Cleaner, and Sonolastic NP1 Polyurethane Sealant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 7, 2017
Abate by
Jan 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Employees engaged in landscaping were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for employees that use chemicals such as but not limited to; 28-0-0 Fertilizer, Krylon Spray Paints, LESCOSol Spray Tank Cleaner, and Sonolastic NP1 Polyurethane Sealant.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342727252.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.