MARCO ISLAND, FL —
OSHA Inspection: DANIEL JO INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DANIEL JO INC. in 1980 SAN MARCO RD, MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342728938.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANIEL JO INC.
- Site address
- 1980 SAN MARCO RD
- City
- MARCO ISLAND
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34145
- Mailing
- 1038 HILLTOP DRIVE, NAPLES, FL 34103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about 10/25/2017, at the above address jobsite, an employee was working on the third tier level of a scaffold that was not fully planked, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 25 ft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1629.6
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about 10/25/2017, at the above address jobsite, an employee was working on the third tier level of a scaffold that was missing adequate means of access, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: On or about 10/25/2017, at the above address jobsite, an employee was working on the third tier level of a scaffold that was erected by an employee who was not competent on scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. or alteration: On or about 10/25/2017, at the above address jobsite, an employee was working on the third tier level of a scaffold that was missing guardrails, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 25 ft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: On or about 10/25/2017, at the above address jobsite, an employee working from a scaffold was not given training by the employer on scaffold related hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1629.6
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.405 A02 II J
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not of the three-wire type: On or about 10/25/17, at the above address jobsite, the extension cord used to power a compressor was missing the ground prong.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about 10/25/17, at the above address jobsite, the extension cord used to power a compressor was used without adequate strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
RENO, NV—2026-07-16
DC MASONRY
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
LODI, NJ—2026-07-15
J & O MASONRY CONTRACTORS
DORAVILLE, GA—2026-07-14
SUDLOW CONCRETE, INC.
FLAGLER BEACH, FL—2026-07-14
PLANET DESIGN SERVICES, INC.
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-16
BRANNON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
SOUTHERN MILLING & LUMBER, INC.
OAKLAND PARK, FL—2026-07-16
PKB CABINETRY
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
ELIJAH WHOLESALE, LLC.
TAMPA, FL—2026-07-16
VALENCIA WHOLESALE, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342728938.